Author summary
87% 15 analyzed articles/videos 2,755 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nina Joudeh results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 3,640 hits . Analysis detected 25,532 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,183 analyzed words across 15 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 57% (3,878 of 8,882 authors). This Nina Joudeh is worse (more manipulative) than 56.30% of the peer group. Nina Joudeh
Author details
Total words: 21,183
Article count: 15
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.3% percentile 2.5% BS Score15 analyzed articles21.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 13.6% 13.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 14.7% 14.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 13.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 17.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.2%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst