Keyword summary
78% 8 analyzed articles/videos 3,717 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Us House Of Representatives results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 1,784 hits . Analysis detected 17,095 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,838 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 33% (40,204 of 59,652 keywords). This Us House Of Representatives is better (less manipulative) than 67.40% of the peer group. Us House Of Representatives
Keyword details
Total words: 18,838
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.6% percentile 1.9% BS Score8 analyzed articles18.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 9.5% 9.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst