Keyword summary
74% 16 analyzed articles/videos 15,264 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trade War results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 4,786 hits . Analysis detected 49,149 faulty-reasoning hits from 68,361 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 16% (50,303 of 59,653 keywords). This Trade War is better (less manipulative) than 84.30% of the peer group. Trade War
Keyword details
Total words: 68,361
Article count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.7% percentile 1.4% BS Score16 analyzed articles68.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst