Keyword summary
71%4 analyzed articles/videos4,154 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Swing Voters results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 1,272 hits. Analysis detected 11,901 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,437 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 21% (44,940 of 56,243 keywords). This Swing Voters is better (less manipulative) than 79.90% of the peer group.
Swing Voters
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
21%Swing Voters (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 15,437
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

20% percentile
025507510020.1% percentile
1.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles15.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.2%8.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.2%8.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate