Keyword summary
5%9 analyzed articles/videos1,663 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Supplemental Security Income results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 3.9% saturation with 277 hits. Analysis detected 1,253 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,054 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.8% and a BS Rank of 2% (58,776 of 59,653 keywords). This Supplemental Security Income is better (less manipulative) than 98.50% of the peer group.
Supplemental Security Income
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
2%Supplemental Security Income (selected)1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

2% percentile
02550751001.5% percentile
0.8% BS Score9 analyzed articles7.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 0.8%Red Herring: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate