Keyword summary
73% 1 analyzed article/video 858 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Strengths results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 404 hits . Analysis detected 2,523 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,432 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 61% (22,596 of 57,289 keywords). This Strengths is worse (more manipulative) than 60.60% of the peer group. Strengths
Keyword details
Total words: 3,432
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.6% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 11.8% 11.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 5.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.9% Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.4% Personal Incredulity: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst