Keyword summary
75% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,672 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Spending Cuts results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 2,028 hits . Analysis detected 13,222 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,688 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 37% (36,665 of 57,345 keywords). This Spending Cuts is better (less manipulative) than 63.90% of the peer group. Spending Cuts
Keyword details
Total words: 14,688
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.1% percentile 2.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles14.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.8% 13.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.5% 10.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.0% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst