Author summary
78%8 analyzed articles/videos6,982 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kevin Frey results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 3,604 hits. Analysis detected 26,265 faulty-reasoning hits from 29,662 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 40% (5,729 of 9,487 authors). This Kevin Frey is better (less manipulative) than 60.40% of the peer group.
Kevin Frey
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
40%Kevin Frey (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 29,662
Article count: 8
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

40% percentile
025507510039.6% percentile
1.9% BS Score8 analyzed articles29.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 12.2%12.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.5%5.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.8%10.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.6%2.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 10.6%10.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 12.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.6%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 2.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate