Keyword summary
76% 20 analyzed articles/videos 10,232 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Spencer Cox results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 4,335 hits . Analysis detected 45,531 faulty-reasoning hits from 61,346 analyzed words across 20 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 15% (51,045 of 59,653 keywords). This Spencer Cox is better (less manipulative) than 85.60% of the peer group. Spencer Cox
Keyword details
Total words: 61,346
Article count: 20
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.4% percentile 1.4% BS Score20 analyzed articles61.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst