Keyword summary
25% 7 analyzed articles/videos 5,553 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Social Engineering results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 4.2% saturation with 1,034 hits . Analysis detected 11,033 faulty-reasoning hits from 24,420 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 7% (50,447 of 53,764 keywords). This Social Engineering is better (less manipulative) than 93.80% of the peer group. Social Engineering
Keyword details
Total words: 24,420
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.2% percentile 1.1% BS Score7 analyzed articles24.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst