Keyword summary
43% 10 analyzed articles/videos 8,375 analyzed words
BS Summary: These San Francisco Bay results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Indoctrination , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 2,135 hits . Analysis detected 19,351 faulty-reasoning hits from 36,300 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 9% (54,726 of 59,653 keywords). This San Francisco Bay is better (less manipulative) than 91.70% of the peer group. San Francisco Bay
Keyword details
Total words: 36,300
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.3% percentile 1.2% BS Score10 analyzed articles36.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst