Author summary
60% 13 analyzed articles/videos 17,829 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah Wright results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , Optimism Bias , and Framing Effect , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 5,721 hits . Analysis detected 45,653 faulty-reasoning hits from 77,746 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 12% (8,372 of 9,471 authors). This Sarah Wright is better (less manipulative) than 88.40% of the peer group. Sarah Wright
Author details
Total words: 77,746
Article count: 13
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.6% percentile 1.2% BS Score13 analyzed articles77.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 7.4% 7.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 5.4% 5.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Author 7.4%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.4%, sitewide 0.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst