Author summary
53% 4 analyzed articles/videos 5,866 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gabriela Glueck results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Anecdotal , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 1,103 hits . Analysis detected 11,219 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,045 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 34% (6,108 of 9,195 authors). This Gabriela Glueck is better (less manipulative) than 66.40% of the peer group. Gabriela Glueck
Author details
Total words: 16,045
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.6% percentile 1.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles16K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.9% 6.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.7% 1.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.4% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst