Keyword summary
55% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,522 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ridley Scott results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Halo Effect , and Availability Heuristic , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18% saturation with 1,816 hits . Analysis detected 8,336 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,088 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 38% (34,965 of 56,235 keywords). This Ridley Scott is better (less manipulative) than 62.20% of the peer group. Ridley Scott
Keyword details
Total words: 10,088
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.8% percentile 2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 18.0% 18.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 18.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.4% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst