Keyword summary
91% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,044 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Real Housewives Of Beverly Hills results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 578 hits . Analysis detected 4,391 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,176 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 70% (17,245 of 56,713 keywords). This Real Housewives Of Beverly Hills is worse (more manipulative) than 69.60% of the peer group. Real Housewives Of Beverly Hills
Keyword details
Total words: 4,176
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.6% percentile 3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.8% 13.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst