Keyword summary
70% 11 analyzed articles/videos 7,441 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rare Earths results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 3,100 hits . Analysis detected 21,030 faulty-reasoning hits from 30,922 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 16% (49,802 of 59,186 keywords). This Rare Earths is better (less manipulative) than 84.10% of the peer group. Rare Earths
Keyword details
Total words: 30,922
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.9% percentile 1.4% BS Score11 analyzed articles30.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.0% 10.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst