Author summary
98% 22 analyzed articles/videos 2,970 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gabriel Dominguez results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 33.5% saturation with 4,270 hits . Analysis detected 20,690 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,741 analyzed words across 20 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 81% (1,687 of 8,669 authors). This Gabriel Dominguez is worse (more manipulative) than 80.50% of the peer group. Gabriel Dominguez
Author details
Total words: 12,741
Article count: 20
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
81% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 80.5% percentile 4.0% BS Score20 analyzed articles12.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 21.8% 21.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.3% 7.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 13.2% 13.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 33.5% 33.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 6.9% 6.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 33.5%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 21.8%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 13.2%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 6.9%, sitewide 1.1% In-Group Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.1%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Tu Quoque: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.2% Begging the Question: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst