Keyword summary
71% 11 analyzed articles/videos 9,761 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Preservation results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Optimism Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 3,183 hits . Analysis detected 30,341 faulty-reasoning hits from 38,013 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 24% (43,269 of 56,415 keywords). This Preservation is better (less manipulative) than 76.70% of the peer group. Preservation
Keyword details
Total words: 38,013
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.3% percentile 1.6% BS Score11 analyzed articles38K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst