Keyword summary
60%7 analyzed articles/videos4,953 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Power Plants results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and False Dilemma, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 1,532 hits. Analysis detected 14,323 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,755 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 33% (38,050 of 56,260 keywords). This Power Plants is better (less manipulative) than 67.60% of the peer group.
Power Plants
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
33%Power Plants (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

32% percentile
025507510032.4% percentile
1.9% BS Score7 analyzed articles18.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.9%6.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.2%8.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.0%8.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 6.6%6.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate