Keyword summary
26% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,149 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Police Investigation results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 594 hits . Analysis detected 2,901 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,273 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 12% (46,950 of 53,046 keywords). This Police Investigation is better (less manipulative) than 88.50% of the peer group. Police Investigation
Keyword details
Total words: 7,273
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.5% percentile 1.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.4% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.1% Horn Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.0% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst