Keyword summary
95% 5 analyzed articles/videos 3,842 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pittsburgh Steelers results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias , Halo Effect , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 1,948 hits . Analysis detected 14,789 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,396 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 55% (26,280 of 58,462 keywords). This Pittsburgh Steelers is worse (more manipulative) than 55.00% of the peer group. Pittsburgh Steelers
Keyword details
Total words: 13,396
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.0% percentile 2.6% BS Score5 analyzed articles13.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 12.7% 12.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.5% 14.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst