Keyword summary
⁠81%1 analyzed article/video1,174 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pamela Smith results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Pessimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 393 hits. Analysis detected 3,090 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,696 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (23,902 of 58,158 keywords). This Pamela Smith is worse (more manipulative) than 58.90% of the peer group.
Pamela Smith
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠59%Pamela Smith (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,696
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

59% percentile
025507510058.9% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.4%8.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.0%8.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.1%Straw Man: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.9%Red Herring: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.7%Circular Reasoning: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos