Author summary
⁠77%1 analyzed article/video1,174 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Quinlan Forrest results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Pessimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 393 hits. Analysis detected 3,090 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,696 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (3,240 of 8,706 authors). This Quinlan Forrest is worse (more manipulative) than 62.80% of the peer group.
Quinlan Forrest
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠63%Quinlan Forrest (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,696
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

63% percentile
025507510062.8% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.4%8.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.0%8.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.8%3.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.9%2.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.2%0.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 5.4%5.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 5.0%5.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.0%Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.1%Straw Man: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.9%Red Herring: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.7%Circular Reasoning: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos