Keyword summary
75% 1 analyzed article/video 1,391 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Orange County School Board results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 512 hits . Analysis detected 4,192 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,564 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 36% (33,503 of 51,681 keywords). This Orange County School Board is better (less manipulative) than 64.80% of the peer group. Orange County School Board
Keyword details
Total words: 5,564
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.2% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst