Keyword summary
58% 4 analyzed articles/videos 4,537 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oppenheimer results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 1,622 hits . Analysis detected 13,881 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,527 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 19% (42,278 of 51,693 keywords). This Oppenheimer is better (less manipulative) than 81.80% of the peer group. Oppenheimer
Keyword details
Total words: 22,527
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.2% percentile 1.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles22.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst