Keyword summary
⁠39%2 analyzed articles/videos1,143 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oil Futures results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 4.7% saturation with 213 hits. Analysis detected 2,470 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,572 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (43,994 of 59,653 keywords). This Oil Futures is better (less manipulative) than 73.70% of the peer group.
Oil Futures
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠27%Oil Futures (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,572
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

26% percentile
025507510026.3% percentile
1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.5%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos