Author summary
12%1 analyzed article/video388 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gaurav Sharma results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Begging the Question, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 5.2% saturation with 80 hits. Analysis detected 394 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,552 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 59% (3,669 of 8,803 authors). This Gaurav Sharma is worse (more manipulative) than 58.30% of the peer group.
Gaurav Sharma
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
59%Gaurav Sharma (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,552
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

58% percentile
025507510058.3% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 2.8%2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 5.2%5.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 2.8%2.8%Blind-Spot BiasSitewide 0.2%Author 1.5%1.5%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Author 2.8%2.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 2.9%2.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.2%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Blind-Spot Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos