Keyword summary
50% 56 analyzed articles/videos 45,514 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oakland results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 4.8% saturation with 10,195 hits . Analysis detected 114,850 faulty-reasoning hits from 211,414 analyzed words across 56 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 5% (53,828 of 56,244 keywords). This Oakland is better (less manipulative) than 95.70% of the peer group. Oakland
Keyword details
Total words: 211,414
Article count: 56
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.3% percentile 1.0% BS Score56 analyzed articles211.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
KTVU 27% 8/6/2026, 5:04:14 PM
KTVU 27% 8/5/2026, 1:43:43 PM
KTVU 27% 8/4/2026, 5:44:27 PM
KTVU 27% 8/4/2026, 2:34:31 PM
KTVU 27% 8/3/2026, 5:12:49 PM