Keyword summary
82%2 analyzed articles/videos766 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Muslim Americans results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and False Dilemma, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 410 hits. Analysis detected 3,151 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,064 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 53% (25,896 of 54,578 keywords). This Muslim Americans is worse (more manipulative) than 52.60% of the peer group.
Muslim Americans
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
53%Muslim Americans (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,064
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

53% percentile
025507510052.6% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 6.8%6.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.4%0.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.5%5.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 13.4%13.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos