Author summary
74% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,137 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Greg Richter results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 468 hits . Analysis detected 4,019 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,548 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 43% (5,164 of 8,953 authors). This Greg Richter is better (less manipulative) than 57.70% of the peer group. Greg Richter
Author details
Total words: 4,548
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.3% percentile 2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.3% 10.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.8% 7.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 5.9% 5.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.0% 10.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.0%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.9%, sitewide 0.8% Anecdotal: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Red Herring: Author 4.7%, sitewide 0.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Straw Man: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst