Keyword summary
28% 1 analyzed article/video 943 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Menominee River results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias , Optimism Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 367 hits . Analysis detected 1,712 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,772 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 34% (39,455 of 59,653 keywords). This Menominee River is better (less manipulative) than 66.10% of the peer group. Menominee River
Keyword details
Total words: 3,772
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.9% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.0% Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.4% Composition/Division: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.2% Circular Reasoning: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst