Keyword summary
75% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,538 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Cuban results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Optimism Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 881 hits . Analysis detected 5,521 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,152 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 57% (22,380 of 51,789 keywords). This Mark Cuban is worse (more manipulative) than 56.80% of the peer group. Mark Cuban
Keyword details
Total words: 6,152
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.8% percentile 2.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 14.3% 14.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst