Keyword summary
80% 118 analyzed articles/videos 50,450 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Manhattan results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 22,447 hits . Analysis detected 189,376 faulty-reasoning hits from 245,699 analyzed words across 118 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 17% (49,927 of 59,652 keywords). This Manhattan is better (less manipulative) than 83.70% of the peer group. Manhattan
Keyword details
Total words: 245,699
Article count: 118
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.3% percentile 1.4% BS Score118 analyzed articles245.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst