Keyword summary
79%5 analyzed articles/videos2,597 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Labor Costs results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 1,153 hits. Analysis detected 9,640 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,378 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 32% (38,751 of 56,739 keywords). This Labor Costs is better (less manipulative) than 68.30% of the peer group.
Labor Costs
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
32%Labor Costs (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 11,378
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

32% percentile
025507510031.7% percentile
1.8% BS Score5 analyzed articles11.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.1%10.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.7%8.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate