Keyword summary
97% 1 analyzed article/video 355 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kristen-Welker results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Ad Hominem , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 216 hits . Analysis detected 1,909 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,420 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 82% (9,991 of 53,020 keywords). This Kristen-Welker is worse (more manipulative) than 81.20% of the peer group. Kristen-Welker
Keyword details
Total words: 1,420
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
81% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 81.2% percentile 4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 13.6% 13.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 15.2% 15.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 3.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 4.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Red Herring: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 0.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 4.6% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.0% Horn Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst