Keyword summary
75% 58 analyzed articles/videos 16,484 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Knicks results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 17,722 hits . Analysis detected 144,365 faulty-reasoning hits from 172,864 analyzed words across 58 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 22% (46,560 of 59,653 keywords). This Knicks is better (less manipulative) than 78.10% of the peer group. Knicks
Keyword details
Total words: 172,864
Article count: 58
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.9% percentile 1.6% BS Score58 analyzed articles172.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst