Keyword summary
99% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,623 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Justice Samuel Alito results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Negativity Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 40.7% saturation with 4,273 hits . Analysis detected 22,863 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,492 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of 87% (7,785 of 59,756 keywords). This Justice Samuel Alito is worse (more manipulative) than 87.00% of the peer group. Justice Samuel Alito
Keyword details
Total words: 10,492
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
87% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 87.0% percentile 5.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 40.7% 40.7% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 29.9% 29.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.7% 11.7% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 13.9% 13.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.5% 9.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 40.7%, sitewide 5.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 29.9%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 22.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 8.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 2.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 1.1% Begging the Question: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Straw Man: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst