Keyword summary
49% 1 analyzed article/video 585 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Junji Ito results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 29.3% saturation with 685 hits . Analysis detected 1,948 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,340 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 67% (20,009 of 59,653 keywords). This Junji Ito is worse (more manipulative) than 66.50% of the peer group. Junji Ito
Keyword details
Total words: 2,340
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.5% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 29.3% 29.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 29.3%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.4% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst