Keyword summary
23% 5 analyzed articles/videos 2,948 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jefferson County Commission results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 4.8% saturation with 566 hits . Analysis detected 4,517 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,792 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 7% (53,650 of 57,480 keywords). This Jefferson County Commission is better (less manipulative) than 93.30% of the peer group. Jefferson County Commission
Keyword details
Total words: 11,792
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.7% percentile 1.1% BS Score5 analyzed articles11.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst