Author summary
3%3 analyzed articles/videos2,578 analyzed words
BS Summary: These André Natta results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Indoctrination, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 3.8% saturation with 393 hits. Analysis detected 2,225 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,312 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 6% (8,200 of 8,711 authors). This André Natta is better (less manipulative) than 94.10% of the peer group.
André Natta
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
6%André Natta (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 10,312
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

6% percentile
02550751005.9% percentile
1.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.1%0.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.7%1.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.2%0.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Nature: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate