Keyword summary
88% 7 analyzed articles/videos 3,673 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Israel Aid results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 2,940 hits . Analysis detected 24,044 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,920 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 47% (30,045 of 56,288 keywords). This Israel Aid is better (less manipulative) than 53.40% of the peer group. Israel Aid
Keyword details
Total words: 21,920
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.6% percentile 2.3% BS Score7 analyzed articles21.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 13.4% 13.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.0% 11.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 13.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst