Author summary
80%1 analyzed article/video905 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Corey Walker results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 583 hits. Analysis detected 3,790 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,620 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 80% (1,885 of 9,103 authors). This Corey Walker is worse (more manipulative) than 79.30% of the peer group.
Corey Walker
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
80%Corey Walker (selected)4%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,620
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

79% percentile
025507510079.3% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.9%8.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 9.8%9.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 16.1%16.1%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 5.7%5.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 5.7%5.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 3.0%3.0%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Author 0.5%0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 16.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 10.0%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 7.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Author 7.0%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 3.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%No True Scotsman: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.1%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos