Keyword summary
87% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,926 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Imports results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 34% saturation with 2,131 hits . Analysis detected 10,678 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,260 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 76% (14,322 of 59,653 keywords). This Imports is worse (more manipulative) than 76.00% of the peer group. Imports
Keyword details
Total words: 6,260
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.0% percentile 3.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 34.0% 34.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.4% 9.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 13.5% 13.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 15.7% 15.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 34.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 13.5%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 5.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 2.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst