Keyword summary
76%4 analyzed articles/videos855 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hybrid results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 738 hits. Analysis detected 7,979 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,873 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 40% (35,907 of 59,751 keywords). This Hybrid is better (less manipulative) than 60.10% of the peer group.
Hybrid
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
40%Hybrid (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,873
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

40% percentile
025507510039.9% percentile
2.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles8.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.8%4.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.1%2.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 8.3%8.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate