Keyword summary
76% 4 analyzed articles/videos 855 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hybrid results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Confirmation Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 738 hits . Analysis detected 7,979 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,873 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 40% (35,907 of 59,751 keywords). This Hybrid is better (less manipulative) than 60.10% of the peer group. Hybrid
Keyword details
Total words: 8,873
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.9% percentile 2.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles8.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst