Keyword summary
96% 2 analyzed articles/videos 859 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Howie Carr results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 37.7% saturation with 1,295 hits . Analysis detected 6,312 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,436 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 86% (8,576 of 59,653 keywords). This Howie Carr is worse (more manipulative) than 85.60% of the peer group. Howie Carr
Keyword details
Total words: 3,436
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
86% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 85.6% percentile 4.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 37.7% 37.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 14.6% 14.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 15.7% 15.7% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 9.5% 9.5% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 37.7%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 15.7%, sitewide 8.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 3.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 1.4% Indoctrination: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Tu Quoque: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 0.2% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.9% Straw Man: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst