Author summary
94% 1 analyzed article/video 789 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Howie Carr results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Out-Group Homogeneity Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 35.7% saturation with 1,128 hits . Analysis detected 5,740 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,156 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of 87% (1,153 of 8,709 authors). This Howie Carr is worse (more manipulative) than 86.80% of the peer group. Howie Carr
Author details
Total words: 3,156
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
87% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 86.8% percentile 4.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 35.7% 35.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 15.8% 15.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 10.3% 10.3% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 9.4% 9.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 15.9% 15.9% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Author 7.2% 7.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.3% 6.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 35.7%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 15.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.6%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 15.9%, sitewide 8.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 15.8%, sitewide 3.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Ad Hominem: Author 10.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 9.4%, sitewide 1.4% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% Tu Quoque: Author 7.2%, sitewide 0.2% In-Group Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Author 6.3%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.9% Straw Man: Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.1%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst