Keyword summary
85%3 analyzed articles/videos1,591 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Frontier Models results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 1,036 hits. Analysis detected 7,087 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,364 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 61% (23,727 of 59,491 keywords). This Frontier Models is worse (more manipulative) than 60.10% of the peer group.
Frontier Models
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
61%Frontier Models (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,364
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

60% percentile
025507510060.1% percentile
2.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 16.3%16.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.8%4.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Keyword 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 16.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate