Keyword summary
63% 9 analyzed articles/videos 7,638 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Friedrich Merz results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 2,723 hits . Analysis detected 20,789 faulty-reasoning hits from 31,449 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 19% (48,906 of 59,742 keywords). This Friedrich Merz is better (less manipulative) than 81.90% of the peer group. Friedrich Merz
Keyword details
Total words: 31,449
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.1% percentile 1.5% BS Score9 analyzed articles31.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst