Keyword summary
59%1 analyzed article/video2,327 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fresno High School results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Hasty Generalization, and Halo Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 619 hits. Analysis detected 5,440 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,308 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 28% (43,208 of 59,653 keywords). This Fresno High School is better (less manipulative) than 72.40% of the peer group.
Fresno High School
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
28%Fresno High School (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 9,308
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

28% percentile
025507510027.6% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos