Keyword summary
84% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,221 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fracking results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Politically Right Leaning Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 980 hits . Analysis detected 5,896 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,884 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 67% (19,809 of 59,726 keywords). This Fracking is worse (more manipulative) than 66.80% of the peer group. Fracking
Keyword details
Total words: 4,884
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.8% percentile 3.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 20.1% 20.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 15.4% 15.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.7% 14.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 15.4%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 20.1%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 1.4% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst